Article : Mickey 17 Receives Mixed Reactions, Needs $400M to Break Even
Source : Newsen via Nate
Bong Joon-ho’s latest sci-fi film Mickey 17 has sparked a mix of anticipation and skepticism as it prepares for its North American release. While some predict strong initial earnings, others remain doubtful about its ability to turn a profit. According to Variety, the film is expected to gross between $18-20 million in its opening weekend across 3,770 theaters in North America. Globally, it is projected to earn between $40-45 million in its first week, but given its reported $118 million production budget, experts estimate it will need at least $275-300 million worldwide to break even.
Despite financial concerns, Mickey 17 has received positive early reviews, with an 87% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. The film’s unique concept—following an expendable clone who repeatedly dies and is regenerated—has intrigued many moviegoers. However, comparisons to Bong’s previous works like Parasite and Snowpiercer have led to divided opinions on its potential success.
Korean viewers have had mixed reactions, with some praising Bong Joon-ho’s signature storytelling while others felt it lacked the impact of his past films.
“Bong Joon-ho’s humor blends well with Hollywood elements. It felt fresh yet familiar. I really enjoyed it!” (👍 629, 👎 55)
“It’s definitely polarizing. My friend found it boring, but I loved every scene. I even watched analysis videos online and want to see it again.” (👍 341, 👎 28)
“One thing’s for sure—it’s not as good as Parasite or Memories of Murder.” (👍 257, 👎 21)
Others pointed out that the film might not resonate as well with audiences outside Korea.
“I fell asleep multiple times… it felt slow and lacked the tension of his previous movies.” (👍 10, 👎 389)
“It’s a mix of Snowpiercer, Okja, and The Host—but not necessarily in a good way.” (👍 11, 👎 374)
“The acting was good, but the story felt flat. I don’t see this being a huge hit.” (👍 10, 👎 402)
Source: Nate Comments
International viewers had a similar mix of excitement and criticism. Some appreciated Bong’s unique storytelling, while others felt his English-language films lack the same depth as his Korean works.
“Even if this is Bong’s weakest film, his ‘worst’ is still likely better than most directors’ best.” (👍 410)
“If a director’s lowest-rated film is at 85%, that says something about his talent.” (👍 103)
“His Korean movies are much better. For some reason, his English-language films feel less natural.” (👍 87)
Some focused on the cast and the film’s broader themes.
“Robert Pattinson is great, but his character’s voice threw me off. Felt like a weird Vincent Price impression.” (👍 79)
“The film’s themes are strong, but I think Western critics judge Korean directors differently. If this were fully in Korean, would it have been rated higher?” (👍 41)
“I loved the movie, but it does feel a bit absurd at times. Not sure how general audiences will take it.” (👍 3)
Source: Reddit Comments
The reactions to Mickey 17 vary between Korean and international audiences:
Korean viewers seem more critical, comparing it unfavorably to Bong Joon-ho’s past works, particularly Parasite and Memories of Murder.
International audiences generally respect Bong’s filmmaking, but some feel his English-language films don’t have the same impact.
Both groups acknowledge that the film has a unique concept, but opinions differ on whether it successfully delivers.
With Mickey 17 hitting theaters worldwide, it remains to be seen whether it can overcome skepticism and achieve box office success. Will it join Bong Joon-ho’s list of critically and commercially successful films, or will it struggle to resonate with audiences?
